As many people wait for the verdict from
the Supreme Court on Obamacare, single-payer has slowly crept in to the minds
of American citizens. I recently read an
article that provided an argument on why the single-payer system should be
under the control of the state government.
The article highlights the many job opportunities and benefits it would
provide for small businesses all over the country. The article stated that the reason certain
businesses are not hiring new employees is because of the amount of money it
would take to provide them with a healthcare plan. Providing jobs and medical coverage are some
of the most common factors brought up when talking about a change within the
health care system. While all the
benefits from having single-payer in the hands of state government sounds
great, I do not think it is necessary to give that power to the state
governments. There can be instances in
which the state government can decide to interpret single-payer in whatever way
they desire which would cause fifty different kinds of single-payer systems in
the country. The interpretation is
where a problem could arise.
While
I myself believe that universal healthcare would be the proper route to go but if
single-payer is the healthcare system that is adopted by our government it
should be controlled by the federal government. If the single-payer system is controlled
by the federal government it would force all medical fees to be paid for
straight from the government’s single-payer fund. Each person would pay a percentage in taxes
to go towards the single-payer fund that would exist within the federal government
instead of the state government. I
believe that it would be more efficient if it was in the hands of the federal
government because I think things tend to get complicated when it is in the
hands of the state governments. With the
federal government regulating the single-payer system it would allow for a
uniform set of policies for all of the states within the union instead of each
state having their own policies. The
goal is to have an efficient affordable health care system, not complicate it
by making it state government controlled.
Very nice post Chris. While the ultimate goal is a national single payer plan we believe that a state by state strategy is the most realistic way to achieve it. Vermont has passed such a plan and several states are considering it as well. Canada's system began at the provincial level and spread throughout the country.
ReplyDelete