Showing posts with label monopolies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label monopolies. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

UPMC Gives Pittsburgh the One-Finger Salute--Twice

UPMC, the largest member of Pittsburgh's health care oligopolywhose fees are well above the national average, was in the news twice last week. The City of Pittsburgh is suing UPMC, which claims to be a non-profit, to strip it of its tax-exempt status. In a court hearing last week, UPMC claimed it does not owe any payroll taxes because it does not have any employees! (Although their website claims they have 55,000 employees, UPMC says these people are employed by subsidiaries.) So far, Judge R. Stanton Wettick, Jr., has not ruled on the credibility of this claim.

The Bombardier BD-700-1A10 Global Express
On Friday, it was learned that UPMC is spending $51 million on a new corporate jet plane, a Bombardier Global Express, described as “a luxury, ultra-long range business jet with twin Rolls Royce engines.” For security reasons, the flight plans of this airplane are to remain hidden from the public.

I'm sure Pittsburghers who are struggling to pay their medical bills will be thrilled to hear that UPMC is able to afford $51 million for a new stealth jetliner. But who is going to ride around on this luxury aircraft, since, as we now know, UPMC has no employees?

You may also be interested in reading:


Sunday, September 23, 2012

New Mike Stout Video on Braddock's Need for a New Community Hospital



I received this new video that was put together by Tony Buba of Braddock Films on the need for a new community hospital in Braddock, PA.  Mike Stout who sings the tribute to Braddock Hospital will also be performing on October 7 at the Frick Fine Arts Center at 7:30 with the Human Union Band.  Details can be seen at the Facebook page here.  Buba is also raising money for a documentary profiling the damage done by Braddock Hospital being closed by UPMC called the Kickstarter Campaign.  Info is below.




**Related Posts** 

 

Unbelievable Promises Monopolized Care—UPMC


Mike Stout & the Human Union Band Concert

Monday, March 12, 2012

Unbelievable Promises Monopolized Care—UPMC


It took UPMC only three months to close a community based hospital that had been in operation for over 100 years.  In 1996, when UPMC purchased Braddock Hospital, did the residents of Braddock have any idea of the demise that would follow?
Braddock, a struggling post steel mill community composed of elderly, low income, and African American residents, utilized the community hospital not only as a source of health care but as a community center. Braddock Hospital, the newest building in the community, also served as a place to get a hot meal in the cafeteria and had the town's only ATM.  It also was the community’s largest employer. The building was slated for demolition in order to build shops and restaurants.
UPMC, a non-profit organization, promises in its mission statement to provide health care to those in need, not to refer them to a bus schedule to travel to a sister hospital.
UPMC (Unbelievable Promises, Monopolized Care) continues to dictate health care while providing million dollar bonuses to their CEO and administrators. They do this by purchasing  facilities only to close them, building multi-million dollar facilities near other non-UPMC facilities, purchasing physician practices, and providing care based on the type of insurance the patient carries.
Decreased census and increased operating expenses have been cited as reasons for the closure of Braddock Hospital. But, if you close the obstetric and oncology units your census will certainly decrease. They also did not include the number of admissions to behavioral health, alcohol, and drug detoxification beds. Braddock was said to have a 69% occupancy rate, which was above standards. Former employees and patients stated they were directed to transfer patients to another UPMC facility regardless of the need.
Traveling to another UPMC facility is not always feasible for the elderly, or those on a fixed income with no means of transportation except for public transportation. If one is sick enough to go to the hospital or emergency room because of an injury or bleeding should they have to wait on the street corner for a bus and make transfers before reaching the hospital. Not every hospital visit necessitates an ambulance and many cannot afford to pay for an ambulance for non-life threatening situations. Would an UPMC official have his family take numerous buses to the hospital? These people probably have physicians waiting for them and their own private rooms.
Despite public outcry and lawsuits the residents of Braddock have received little conciliation. They did receive minimal satisfaction in a civil rights injunction; an agreement was reached that provided van service to doctor's offices in the area for an additional three years. But they still have no local facility to receive health care.
Yes, healthcare has become a business where the elite profit (like the steel mills before their closure and UPMC) and those in need continue to be the victims of circumstance (like the community of Braddock).

Friday, January 13, 2012

Gekkonomics

You won't be surprised to learn that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's (UPMC) out-of-network fees are way above the national average. According to data compiled by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, UPMC charges more than many of the nation's most highly regarded hospitals, such as the Cleveland Clinic, and twice as much as its only real competitor, Allegheny General Hospital (AGH). In 2010, UPMC's average charge for inpatient care was $121,765, compared to $74,406 at the Cleveland Clinic and $55,205 at AGH.

Out-of-network fees originated in the 1980s, when Medicare and Medicaid began reimbursing hospitals prospectively rather than after-the-fact for some procedures. Insurance companies then began to negotiate discounts for their subscribers, in exchange for channeling those subscribers to “approved” doctors and hospitals. By 1990, only people without health insurance and international visitors were charged the “full cost” of medical services—the out-of-network rate. For people with health insurance, the “full cost” is really just funny money—an unrealistically high charge that appears on their statement. Health insurance pays only a fraction of that cost, and the remainder is waived.

However, in June 2013, out-of-network fees may become real money for many Western Pennsylvanians if UPMC, the region's largest hospital chain, carries out its threat not to negotiate an agreement with Highmark, the region's largest health insurance company.

If we accept the Medicare reimbursement rate as the real cost of hospitalization plus a modest profit for the provider, then UPMC has an average markup of 850%. Dr. Gerald Anderson, a health policy expert at Johns Hopkins University, is quoted as saying, “I think they have an ethical problem in trying to say they should be paid eight times more than what it costs to provide the service.”

This brings us to the presumed motive for UPMC's and Highmark's behavior—monopoly control and the ability to fix prices. Large corporations move toward monopolies through two types of integration, horizontal and vertical.

Horizontal integration occurs when companies buy out competitors that provide the same product or service, thereby increasing their market share. For the last decade, UPMC has been aggressively buying other hospitals in the region. AGH is its only major remaining competitor. If it provides an essential service and has no competitors, it can charge whatever it wants.

Vertical integration occurs when a company controls several stages in the supply chain that produces a product or service. For example, a company that sells natural gas to consumers may also own gas wells and control prices by speeding up or slowing down production. Or a movie studio may own a theatre chain which preferentially books its films and refuses to book films by competitors. In 1998, UPMC started its own health insurance division, the UPMC Health Plan. Highmark retaliated by agreeing to purchase AGH. Of course, both hospitals and insurance companies can use the threat of out-of-network fees to pressure clients to purchase the complementary service from its own affiliate.

It appears that both UPMC and Highmark are trying to obtain monopoly control of the health care system in Western Pennsylvania. Since our very lives are at stake, if either of these “nonprofits” achieves their goal, they will be in a position to make us what organized crime calls “an offer we can't refuse.”

Of course, this kind of outrageous profit-taking would disappear under a single payer health care system.