Showing posts with label propaganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label propaganda. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

I Agree with Rick Santorum's comparison of the ACA and Apartheid, Sort Of

Former Sen. Rick Santorum actually compared the Affordable Care Act (or Obamacare as he calls it) to Apartheid South Africa.  Here is his quote as he was paying tribute to Nelson Mandela on Fox News “was fighting against some great injustice. I would make the argument that we have a great injustice going on right now in this country with an ever-increasing size of government that is taking over and controlling people’s lives — and Obamacare is front and center in that.”



The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Video Archive

On the face of it this seems to ridiculous to comment on but ol' Rick might be on to something here. First lets look at the word apartheid,  In Dutch and it's dialect Afrikaans it means apartness.  Our pre ACA health care system definitely resembled an apartheid system with access to healthcare tied to employment, ability to pay, eligibility for Medicare or Medicaid, veterans status, and charity.  For decades the US was paired with South Africa as the only industrialized nations without a universal healthcare program and also with the death penalty.  

After Mandela was released, the right to access to medical care was affirmed in their constitution and the death penalty was abolished.  While leading almost all African nations, South Africa still lags behind the US and other developed nations in life expectancy and infant mortality due to low per capita income and other factors such as the AIDS epidemic as can be seen here. A description of their health system can be seen here.

The US system has passed and is in the process of implementing the Affordable Care Act.  It does some to alleviate the apartness of our health care system with the individual mandate and Medicaid expansion.  However in Pennsylvania and other states, some governors are refusing to expand Medicaid or expanding it with strings attached.  Those who are still not eligible have to purchase insurance or pay a fine. Single payer levels the playing field so everyone is no longer apart.  Until then apartheid remains in a modified form.  Sen. Santorum does raise some important issues just not in the way he intended.


**Related Posts**



The Affordable Care Act Having an Impact in Some States but not Pennsylvania



The Affordable Care Act (ACA) having little effect on PA's Uninsured Rate So Far


Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Wall Street Journal Report on Employers Eying Bare Bones Health Plans Under the Affordable Care Act

The Wall Street Journal has a report on how employers are looking at bare bones insurance plans to control costs  (subscription needed to read online) that they are required to provide under the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare).  This comes as little surprise to Single Payer advocates who know that a nonprofit healthcare system is most efficient at providing care and controlling costs as our economic impact study shows.  Canadian Ellen Page eloquently defends her country's healthcare system against right wing critics below.  This is our 150th post.



**Related Posts**

New Time Magazine Article on Healthcare Costs with Stewart Discussion
Real Reasons for High Medical Costs

Those Rapacious Health Insurers Raise Premiums 9% This Year for Job Based Health Insurance

An Explanation of Washington Post Graphs on the Cost of Procedures

Friday, July 6, 2012

Does Propaganda Work?

First of all, before you read any further, you have to take this pop quiz on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) written by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Finished yet? O.K., now you can read Kaiser's analysis of the results. You'll find that less than 1% of respondents got all ten items correct. I was one of them, which is why you people should listen to me when I'm talking!  ;)  You'll also find that people who got fewer correct answers were (among other things) more likely to be Republicans, watchers of Fox News, and in favor of repealing the law.

Kevin Drum has constructed the following chart. He points out that there has been more conservative disinformation regarding the five items that more people answered incorrectly than the other five. This suggests that the right wing and their media enablers have been effective in misleading the public about the ACA.


I'm not sure I buy Drum's argument, since he has no data on how frequently false claims were made. I don't recall hearing that much about the nonexistent mandate that small businesses offer coverage to their employees, for example. Of course, there have been more complaints about the individual mandate than any other provision of the ACA, but in this case, the conservatives have not lied about it. There really is an individual mandate, although they have neglected to point out how small a percentage of Americans will be affected by it.

In order to get these results, you need more than just conservative propaganda. You also need corporate news media that fail to correct it, media that present these false claims as a he-said-she-said “controversy,” without explaining who is right and who is wrong.


Update

Thanks to Paul Ricci for pointing out that paid advertisements have almost certainly been a major factor in spreading public misinformation about the ACA. On June 20, The New York Times added up the expenditures to that date.

The amount spent attacking the ACA ($235 million) was 3.4 times the amount spent defending it ($69 million). Almost all the pro-ACA ads were from the Department of Health and Human Service ($47 million)--ads which the Times describes as “bland, explaining aspects of the law.” The anti-ACA ads come largely from the usual cast of Elephants who have emerged as major players in the post-Citizens United ad wars—the U. S. Chamber of Commerce ($27 million), Karl Rove's Crossroads USA ($18 million), etc. As part of the captive audience for these ads, I would not describe them as bland. The anti-ACA ads play to people's fears about government takeovers (“socialism”), rising deficits, and the rationing of care.

The anti-ACA ads have played primarily in swing states such as Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio, suggesting that they are, in part, an early start to the presidential campaign. Many readers of this blog have seen these ads, since they live near Pittsburgh, the fourth largest market for these ads ($7.6 million), or Philadelphia ($7.9 million), the second largest market.