Saturday, January 21, 2012

Canadian Testimonials



We often hear about from opponents of health care reform testimonials about the horror stories of the Canadian health care system to scare individuals here into opposing real reform here in the US.  It's always easy to find a few cases where the system did not work in a large country like Canada.  Here are testimonials which are far more typical from Canadians according to surveys eh.

**Related Posts**

STOP Obamacare in Pennsylvania and the Uninsured

 

STOP Obamacare in Pennsylvania: Where We Agree with Them

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Since August, 88,000 Pennsylvania children have lost Medicaid benefits - Philly.com

This article was posted on how 88,071 children have lost Medicaid benefits due to bureaucratic backlog at the Department of Public Welfare with an increase in December (possibly when employees go on vacation for the holidays).


                                   Total              Change                     %                                                                                                                        
August                      1,161,135            
September                1,143,169      - 17,966                 - 1.5%  
October                     1,130,300      - 12,869                 - 1.1%  
November                 1,117,728      - 12,572                 - 1.1%  
December                 1,073,064       - 44,664                   - 4%     
Change over four months:       - 88,071                - 7.6%  

These benefits should eventually be restored as Medicaid is still a federal entitlement program.  The conditions for employees at the PA Department of Public Welfare (DPW) have gotten worse in recent decades with staff reductions and caseloads increasing.  There were rumors of a strike in 2003 when I was an employee there when Rendell was newly inaugurated as governor.  The state budget was $40 billion then it is $27 billion now.  Data for adults is harder to come by according to the article but it is just as important.  It is a trick to starve social programs and then to argue that "see social programs don't work."

**Related Post**

The Pennsylvania Medicaid Budgetary Squeeze

Saturday, January 14, 2012

STOP Obamacare in Pennsylvania: Where We Agree with Them

In my previous post on the STOP Obamacare in Pennsylvania, I commented on how Dr. Nicholas Pandelidis downplayed the problem of the uninsured in the US citing faulty research.  However there are some areas of agreement single payer advocates have with this group of controlling costs with the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) that we do have.  Pandelidis cites many studies by groups like the Congressional Budget Office or CBO which show that health care costs have skyrocketed in the past and the new law will not control costs and be harmful to patients and providers.  He does note that costs have risen faster for the private sector than for Medicare and Medicaid in the last decade.  He goes on to list the causes driving the increases in cost here in the US which is "access to superior care" which is debunked in the graphic below and in the blog The Incidental Economist, the "third party payer system" which inflates costs due to profiteering, government regulation of insurance industry competition (how is the Highmanrk/UPMC tussle reducing costs and improving care for Pennsylvanians?), federal tax policy favoring employer provided versus individually purchased insurance (which is like switching the burden from Peter to Paul), and of course medical malpractice costs which is debunked in part two of the graphic below.

I am a statistician.  My background is not in actuarial science (financial forecasting).  I don't like relying on other people's arguments to build my own but this topic is too important for me to leave out.  We agree with the opponents that health care costs need to be controlled and with opponents of Obamacare that it will do little to curtail the causes of the inflation.  We do not agree with the proposed solutions.  Many other industrialized nations are better able to control costs and provide care with better outcomes than we are.  In Pandelidis' article, he even agrees that public insurance plans control costs better than private.

Why Your Stitches Cost $1,500 - Part One




Why Your Stitches Cost $1,500 - Part Two


**Related Posts**

Gekkonomics

 

Santorum: No One Has Ever Died Because They Didn’t Have Health Care | The New Civil Rights Movement

 

Friday, January 13, 2012

Gekkonomics

You won't be surprised to learn that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's (UPMC) out-of-network fees are way above the national average. According to data compiled by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, UPMC charges more than many of the nation's most highly regarded hospitals, such as the Cleveland Clinic, and twice as much as its only real competitor, Allegheny General Hospital (AGH). In 2010, UPMC's average charge for inpatient care was $121,765, compared to $74,406 at the Cleveland Clinic and $55,205 at AGH.

Out-of-network fees originated in the 1980s, when Medicare and Medicaid began reimbursing hospitals prospectively rather than after-the-fact for some procedures. Insurance companies then began to negotiate discounts for their subscribers, in exchange for channeling those subscribers to “approved” doctors and hospitals. By 1990, only people without health insurance and international visitors were charged the “full cost” of medical services—the out-of-network rate. For people with health insurance, the “full cost” is really just funny money—an unrealistically high charge that appears on their statement. Health insurance pays only a fraction of that cost, and the remainder is waived.

However, in June 2013, out-of-network fees may become real money for many Western Pennsylvanians if UPMC, the region's largest hospital chain, carries out its threat not to negotiate an agreement with Highmark, the region's largest health insurance company.

If we accept the Medicare reimbursement rate as the real cost of hospitalization plus a modest profit for the provider, then UPMC has an average markup of 850%. Dr. Gerald Anderson, a health policy expert at Johns Hopkins University, is quoted as saying, “I think they have an ethical problem in trying to say they should be paid eight times more than what it costs to provide the service.”

This brings us to the presumed motive for UPMC's and Highmark's behavior—monopoly control and the ability to fix prices. Large corporations move toward monopolies through two types of integration, horizontal and vertical.

Horizontal integration occurs when companies buy out competitors that provide the same product or service, thereby increasing their market share. For the last decade, UPMC has been aggressively buying other hospitals in the region. AGH is its only major remaining competitor. If it provides an essential service and has no competitors, it can charge whatever it wants.

Vertical integration occurs when a company controls several stages in the supply chain that produces a product or service. For example, a company that sells natural gas to consumers may also own gas wells and control prices by speeding up or slowing down production. Or a movie studio may own a theatre chain which preferentially books its films and refuses to book films by competitors. In 1998, UPMC started its own health insurance division, the UPMC Health Plan. Highmark retaliated by agreeing to purchase AGH. Of course, both hospitals and insurance companies can use the threat of out-of-network fees to pressure clients to purchase the complementary service from its own affiliate.

It appears that both UPMC and Highmark are trying to obtain monopoly control of the health care system in Western Pennsylvania. Since our very lives are at stake, if either of these “nonprofits” achieves their goal, they will be in a position to make us what organized crime calls “an offer we can't refuse.”

Of course, this kind of outrageous profit-taking would disappear under a single payer health care system.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Occupy UPMC Insurance and Highmark-Pittsburgh, PA USA

Southwest Pennsylvanians, unlike our Republican Candidates declare, can not "fire their insurance companies." (Mitt Romney) And, for Senator Rick Santorum, please come to my family, or spend one day at our office and you will find that there are thousands of Pennsylvanians who do die of lack of access to Health Care!

If you are tired of the Lies, Please join PUSH, Occupy Pittsburgh, Save Our Community Hospitals, SW Pa for Single Payers and others who are protesting for Universal, Affordable Healthcare

February 11, Tues, Noon, at Occupy Pittsburgh, then March and Rally at US Steel Building (UPMC Insurance) and then Highmark Insurance Rally. BTW, Its Free.

Romney's Gaffe

Governor Mitt Romney's statement, "I like being able to fire people," has been widely misinterpreted. He did not say that he enjoys firing his employees. The reality is much worse. The remark was made in the context of a discussion of health insurance. It shows how out of touch Romney is with the health insurance system in this country.


Please read this comment by Aaron Carroll, from The Incidental Economist blog. He points out why most Americans can't fire their insurance company. I have nothing to add. I just wanted to call it to your attention.

Friday, January 6, 2012

Santorum: No One Has Ever Died Because They Didn’t Have Health Care | The New Civil Rights Movement

This is my first cross post on my two blogs because it fits in so nicely with what I've been talking about on both of them, Rick Santorum and the uninsured. As the former Senator from our state is quoted in the story linked below stating that no one has died due to a lack of health insurance while campaigning in Iowa in early December while he was still polling in the single digits. The exact quote can be read here.  This statement is consistent with his later statement right before the caucus regarding African-Americans and entitlement programs which preceded his strong showing on Jan 3 (only 4% in the CNN entrance poll said health care was the most important issue in the Caucus).


This one claim about health care is so demonstrably false with the study I discussed in my previous post on the PUSH website where 45,000 excess deaths in the US each year were estimated from a lack of insurance after adjusting for smoking, obesity, and poverty.  It would only be necessary to show one death from a lack of insurance to prove Santorum's statement wrong.  Josef Stalin once infamously said "one death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic."  It is important to supplement the statistics with narratives from those who are affected most by the problem of the lack of insurance.  That is why we included testimonials like the ones below from Healthy Artists on this webpage from the uninsured.




Michael Moore's film Sicko has the stories of several individuals who are underinsured including a few who died as a result of their situation.  The website Names of the Dead has testimonials from families of those who died as a result of a lack of insurance.  It gives the names and cities of each story so they can be checked for veracity.  This is one from Altoona, PA.  Senator Santorum says he wants to save America from fascism as his grandfather escaped it in Italy.  The first step in fighting it is acknowledging the truth.

Uncle Abe

64, Altoona PA
Cindy Lovell writes:
My Uncle Abe worked as a self-employed plumber. Some years he could afford insurance, and some years he couldn't. He came down with congestive heart failure, and he could not afford insurance. He kept waiting to see a doctor until he turned 65 so he would have Medicare. He waited and hoped. Finally, he got so sick that my other two uncles went and got him. They intended to take him to the emergency room and pay his bill. Both are retired and on fixed incomes, yet their baby brother was so sick, and they were so scared, that they figured they would come up with some way to pay his hospital bills. However, Uncle Abe died in the emergency room... waiting to turn 65!

Santorum's "Bounce"

 

Making Sense of the Pat Toomey-Joe Sestak Senate Race

 

STOP Obamacare in Pennsylvania and the Uninsured

 

Teapartiers sandbagged by health insurers | MollyRush's Blog and a calculation mortality rates for lack of insurance